irishracing.com editor Vincent Finegan explained that he did not disagree with the decision on the day but questioned whether the result could have been called as a dead heat.
“The only thing I would say here is you talk about Jack Kennedy having to sit and suffer, he was sitting and suffering, and still using his whip the whole way up.
“You see in a lot of these things where they have to take evasive action. He didn't have to take evasive action. He was still riding a finish as well.
“We know that the horse on the outside, the Noel Meade horse, is leaning in. Fair enough. So it does impede his mount. But both jockeys kept riding all the way to the line. It was marginal enough in my view.
“I'm not saying that it shouldn't have been reversed. I think it was probably the right decision.
“But I can see why Noel Meade would feel a little bit aggrieved and decide to appeal it.
“It's toss a coin stuff and that's the problem with an awful lot of this.
“A dead heat in that instance in Galway would have been fantastic for the punters. You get two winners rather than one on the day.
“I know those stay-at-home punters are getting paid double results; it doesn't bother them, they win on both.
“But the ones on track don't and that's always a thing that's a bug bear as well.”