Emma Nagle pointed to Hong Kong where much more information is given about horses before the race and suggested a similar change in Ireland and the UK will keep punters and bookmakers engaged.
“I suppose it's a black spot in the rules, something that doesn't sit under the radar but just seems to be accepted,” she explained.
“It probably depends on a situational basis. With Birr Castle, I'd say he achieved beyond his best possible position by making the running in the Juddmonte.
“But a lot of the time the pacemaker drops away, even when they're good horses. We've seen the likes of Continuous used as a pacemaker this season, a Leger winner.
“Personally, I don't have a massive problem with pacemakers if they set the race up to be a true test, so be it.
“But maybe, like Johnny alluded to, connections should have to declare it going into a race. That way punters know and everyone knows. And if it doesn't transpire and they end up not making the pace, connections could be brought before the stewards and see what happens. It doesn't always happen, pacemakers don't always do their job.
“It's more of an issue when a yard has multiple runners and you're left guessing — is this horse going to make the pace, is that one, or are any of them?
“It can be a minefield, tactically, especially in small fields. At the top level you're left guessing what these horses are going to do and it can be unpredictable, which is difficult for punters.
“You see in Hong Kong and other jurisdictions, where more information is made available to punters before the race. If you're gathering data over a period of time, that will obviously be helpful for punters. You can get a gauge of how fit a horse is, how strong they have gotten from year-to-year.
“Providing as much information to punters is the best thing racing can do going down the line. Punters and bookmakers are steadily losing interest for various reasons.”